OFF MIC - A NEWSLETTER ABOUT PODCAST STRATEGY FOR CMOs

ED BARKER | 2.19.26

Why Podcast? The Strategic Case for Audio in Your Marketing Mix

tl;dr

Podcasts don't compete with white papers or programmatic advertising. They do a different job entirely. While other formats drive awareness or deliver information, podcasts build relationships. A listener spends 30, 45, 60 minutes with your business, hearing how your people think, understanding what you stand for. That's not performance marketing. It's trust built one episode at a time. This newsletter is about the art and science of podcasting. And this edition is about where podcasting sits in the marketing funnel, how it works for both B2B and B2C, and how to think about proving the value when the numbers don't fit neatly into a spreadsheet.

The wrong question

Many brands approach podcasting backwards. Should we do a podcast instead of a white paper? Instead of video? Instead of more programmatic spend?

It’s the wrong question.

Podcasting doesn't replace other channels. A white paper delivers information. Video captures attention. Programmatic drives clicks. Each has a job in the mix. But podcasting does something else.

It builds relationships.

Not in a soft, unmeasurable, brand-fluff sense. Something more specific. Podcasts create the conditions for trust before the sales conversation happens and deepens trust after the sale.

The real question isn't whether to podcast instead of other formats. It's whether your marketing mix is missing the thing that only podcasting can do.

Where podcasting sits in the funnel

Podcasting touches everything but its weight isn't evenly distributed.

Awareness. People don't search for brand podcasts or stumble across them through paid media. Programmatic and paid social will always beat it for raw reach. Podcasting picks up where awareness leaves off.

Consideration. This is where it earns its keep. Someone knows you exist but they're evaluating whether to trust you. A podcast lets them spend hours with your brand. By the time they talk to sales, the relationship has already started.

Decision. Podcasting rarely closes deals. But it warms the lead. Sales conversations go easier when the prospect already feels like they know you. The trust is already half-built.

Loyalty. A podcast keeps you present after the sale, deepens the relationship, turns customers into people who actively recommend you. For consumer brands especially, this is often where the real value sits.

Middle funnel and post-purchase. That's the sweet spot. Podcasting isn't an acquisition channel. It's a trust channel.

B2B applications

B2B buyers are making high-stakes decisions. Significant budget. Multiple stakeholders. They're evaluating your expertise as much as your product.

A podcast gives them evidence. They hear your thinking directly. They figure out whether you actually know what you're talking about.

It's also a hedge against long sales cycles. B2B decisions take months. A podcast keeps you in the room during that process. Every episode reinforces your credibility without requiring any sales effort at all.

When the buyer finally reaches a decision, you're not starting from scratch. You've been with them the whole time.

B2C applications

Consumer brands face a different problem. Markets full of substitutes. Products that look the same on the shelf.

The brands that win are the ones people feel something about. A podcast shows what you stand for rather than just claiming it.

You can print "we care about quality" on your packaging. Or you can tell the story of the family who've been growing your ingredients for three generations. One is a claim. The other is a feeling.

The best consumer podcasts never talk about the product directly. They talk about the things the brand and its customers both care about. The product is present but never the point. The relationship is the point.

How to think about measurement

This is where CMOs get stuck. The strategic case sounds reasonable but how do you prove it?

Honest answer: you can't measure podcasting like programmatic. And trying will only frustrate you.

Programmatic has a clean line from impression to click to conversion. Rapid feedback, clear attribution. Podcasting doesn't work like that. Force it into the same model and it will always look like a failure.

Podcasting is brand marketing with a longer timeline and effects that are real but indirect. Your measurement approach has to match.

Directly measurable: Downloads, listens, subscriber growth. Are people showing up? Completion rates. Are they staying? Episode-over-episode retention. Are they coming back? Detailed analytics can tell you age, location, even which companies your listeners work for.

These are leading indicators. They tell you whether the show is working as a show.

Indirectly measurable: The business impact shows up elsewhere, often in metrics you're already tracking.

Sales cycle length. Leads who've listened should move faster. Compare the cohorts.

Lead quality. Ask sales whether podcast listeners need less convincing. The qualitative signal matters here.

Branded search. Growing podcast audience often correlates with more people looking you up. They hear your name repeatedly and eventually get curious.

Customer retention. Podcast listeners tend to stick around longer. They churn less.

Not measurable, and that's fine: Clean last-touch attribution isn't happening. Someone who listened for six months before filling out a form will credit whatever they touched most recently. The podcast did the work but it won't get the credit.

That's not a measurement flaw. It's just how memory works.

The same is true for sponsorships, events, PR. None of them attribute cleanly. CMOs still invest because the effects are real even when the spreadsheet can't capture them. Podcasting belongs in that category.

The mindset shift: Stop asking what's the ROI of this episode. Start asking what does our pipeline look like for people who've engaged with the podcast versus people who haven't.

The comparison reveals the value. Not the direct attribution.

There’ll nbe more on measurement frameworks in next week’s edition. The principle is simple: measure podcasting like brand marketing, not performance marketing. Judge it on the outcomes it's actually designed to create.

When podcasting is the wrong choice

It's not for everyone - for example if you need results this quarter. Podcasting is a long game. Spend the budget elsewhere.

Wrong if you don't have something to say. A podcast needs a point of view, expertise worth sharing, stories. If all you've got is product messaging you'll end up making an advertorial.

It’s wrong if you can't commit. Six episodes then silence does more harm than good. If you're not ready for at least a year, don't start.

Wrong if your audience doesn't listen to podcasts. Some demographics and contexts just don't fit audio. It’s worth checking before you commit.

Be honest about whether the conditions are right. A good podcast is genuinely valuable. A half-hearted one is a waste of everyone's time.

The strategic question

The decision to podcast isn't really about podcasting.

It's about how you build relationships with your market.

Every marketing mix has gaps. Paid media drives awareness but doesn't build trust. Content marketing informs but doesn't connect. Sales conversations convert but can't scale.

Podcasting fills a specific gap. Trust and familiarity with people who aren't ready to buy yet. Presence during long consideration periods. Deeper relationships with people who've already bought. Evidence of your expertise and values without having to claim them outright.

The question for any CMO: does that gap exist in your mix?

If your brand struggles to build credibility before the sales conversation. If prospects go cold during long evaluation cycles. If customers don't stick around after the first purchase.

Podcasting might be worth a serious look.

1878.STUDIO